Cases 101 - 110 of 128
Guy v. Channell et al
as 4:2012cv00481
Plaintiff:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant:
Lisa Calhoun Channell, Kermit B Channell, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2012cv00419
Plaintiff:
Dustin Chandler
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Stubenrauch et al
as 4:2012cv00106
Plaintiff:
Dustin Neal Brown
Defendant:
Mike Blain, Doc Holiday, Bob Blankenship and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Sherwood Police Department et al
as 4:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Olajuwon L Hicks
Defendant:
Sherwood Police Department, Arkansas State Police, Jeff Hagar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2011cv00909
Plaintiff:
Howard Jones
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 5:2011cv05282
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Nichols, Jr
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Robin F Green, Brynna F Barnica and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2011cv00899
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Nichols, Jr
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Robin F Green, Brynna F Barnica and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Jones et al
as 4:2011cv04057
Plaintiff:
Javar Wilson
Defendant:
Carlton Jones, Arkansas, State of and Miller County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Pitts v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 11-2306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Issac Pitts
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Jegley, Prosecuting Attorney, Pulaski County, W. A. McCormick, Chief Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Pulaski County, Durthey Bishop, Investigator, Pulaski County and others
Judd v. Arkansas Secretary of State et al
as 4:2011cv00447
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Arkansas Secretary of State and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
