Cases 161 - 170 of 6,057
Jarvis v. Jarvis et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Carolyn Jarvis, Michelle Shook, Robyn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hudson v. Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2023ct03246
Plaintiff:
Monte Lovette Hudson
Defendant:
Department of Adult Correction, Alexander Correctional Officers, Alexander Correctional Institution Staff (Intake) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WARDLOW SR. v. FAW et al
as 1:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEWIS WARDLOW, SR.
Defendant:
C.J. FAW, D.W. COPPOLA, J.M. REYES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LILES v. EDWARDS
as 1:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
REGINALD M. LILES
Defendant:
BRITTANY P. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. DICKERSON et al
as 1:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Defendant:
MR. DICKERSON and MR. PHILLIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEON v. N.C. HIGHWAY PATROL et al
as 1:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
NESTOR LEON
Defendant:
N.C. HIGHWAY PATROL and FNU CRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wagner et al
as 5:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Wagner, FNU Smith, FNU Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRICE v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PRICE
Defendant:
D.C. ROBINSON, CYNTHIA B. KENNEY, DUSTIN YUENGLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOTHARP v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
ZANNIE J. LOTHARP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Gladden v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Tyrone D. Gladden
Defendant:
FNU Honeycutt and FNU Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
