Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Van Dyke v. Butner Regional Forsenic Administrator et al
as 1:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
Butner Regional Forsenic Administrator, Charles Vance, James Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. Butner Regional Central Hospital Administor et al
as 1:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
Butner Regional Central Hospital Administor, Charles Vance, James Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Sabbine et al
as 3:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marcus Curry
Defendant:
Nick Sabbine, Anne M. Tompkins, Haakon Thorsen and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CURRY et al
as 1:2011cv00852
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRENT CURRY, MIKE FUQUAY, BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locklear v. Thomas et al
as 5:2010ct03146
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Locklear
Defendant:
Sandra F. Thomas, Don Hunt, Mr. Maynor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CURRY et al
as 1:2010cv00499
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRENT CURRY, JULIAN DOBY and R.M. FUQUAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolbert v. Duda et al
as 5:2007ct03088
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Tolbert
Defendant:
Sergeant Duda, Sgt. Griffin, Clay Bonde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. BENNETT et al
as 1:2007cv00404
Plaintiff:
MARTIN A. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
BOYD BENNETT, THEODIS BECK, GEORGE CURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. Simmons et al
as 5:2007ct03068
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Z. Simmons, Joseph Lightsey, Guard Bosworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. Duda et al
as 5:2007ct03066
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Sergeant Duda, Officer Brodie, Guard Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
