Cases 11 - 20 of 512
Moose v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Michael Earl Moose
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Holman et al
as 6:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
John A Grimes
Defendant:
Unknown Holman, Warden Unknown Marshall, Director, TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Terry Dickerson
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Brandon Birmingham, Sarah Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busby v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ladon Busby
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
John A Grimes
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, State of Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Unknown Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dodd v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Roger Lavoy Dodd
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Danny Hogen and Danny Hogan
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Officer Unknown Unknown, Officer Ashton Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00249
Petitioner:
Robert Caldwell
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
