Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Brooks v. Samuel et al
as 1:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Charles Aaron Brooks
Defendant:
Charles E Samuel, Jr. , Mathew Paimpalil , Briant Ennis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Vauda Shipp, Jr. v. Zack Hawthorn, et al
as 16-41693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAUDA VIRGLE SHIPP, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ZACK HAWTHORN, Magistrate Judge, RACHEL CHAPA, FRANK LARA and others
Dinkins v. Polavarapj et al
as 1:2016cv00276
Plaintiff:
James Dinkins
Defendant:
Sreedhar Polavarapj, Frank Lara, S Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dinkins v. Lara et al
as 6:2016cv01002
Plaintiff:
James Dinkins
Defendant:
Frank Lara, Sreedhar Polavarapu, S Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Samuels et al
as 1:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Samuel Murray
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, John A Keller, Frank Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shipp v. Hawthorn et al
as 1:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
Vauda Virgle Shipp, Jr
Defendant:
Zack Hawthorn, Rachel Chapa, Frank Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lindsey v. Lara Do Not Docket. Case Transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division.
as 2:2015cv00215
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lindsey
Defendant:
Frank Lara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl v. Samuels et al
as 1:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Frank Lara, League Medical Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schwindling v. Samuels et al
as 1:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
George A Schwindling
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Frank Lara and Jose A Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jesse Lara v. Joe Shannon, et al
as 14-11170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE FRANK LARA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE SHANNON, District Attorney - Tarrant County, BRAD LIVINGSTON, STEVEN C. MCCRAW, Director, Department of Public Safety and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
