Cases 11 - 20 of 78
McCormick v. Graham et al
as 5:2022ct03020
Plaintiff:
Markus Odon McCormick
Defendant:
Sasha Graham, City of Fayetteville and Fayetteville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. HARMON et al
as 1:2021cv00877
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant:
LISA HARMON, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEYERS v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MR. JACOBS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. S. BRADDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARRINGTON v. HAIRSTON et al
as 1:2021cv00556
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
SANDRA J. HAIRSTON, GRAHAM GREEN, ESQ. and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRACE v. ALAMANCE COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv00755
Defendant:
ALAMANCE COUNTY, OFFICER Z. HULCHER, OFFICER CROSS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GRACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRACE v. GRAHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00313
Defendant:
CROSS, C. T. DENNY and GRAHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. GRACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGULEY v. BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00263
Defendant:
ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff:
MELDAMION ANTOINE HUGULEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Smith et al
as 5:2019ct03222
Defendant:
Arbitrator Shirley, Jason Smith, M. Weiss and others
Plaintiff:
Sug M. Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langston v. Edwards
as 5:2018hc02236
Plaintiff:
William Burke Langston, III
Respondent:
Claudette Edwards
Defendant:
James Forte, Nicole Mitchell, Danny Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Fowler et al
as 5:2018ct03173
Defendant:
Eric Montgomery, Willis Fowler, Angela Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry P. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
