Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Marbury v. Estes et al
as 4:2018cv00925
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Marbury
Defendant:
DeWayne Estes, Cedric Specks, Carla Graham and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russo v. Dunn et al
as 2:2017cv01005
Plaintiff:
Victor Joseph Russo
Defendant:
Jefferson S Dunn, Kay Ivey, Dewayne Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Smith et al
as 4:2015cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Loyd Brown
Defendant:
C Smith, Collier, Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Hall et al
as 2:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Hall, Scott, J Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallworth v. Graham et al
as 4:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Freddie James Stallworth
Defendant:
Carla Graham, Chad Cleveland and Carter Davenport
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Harriss et al
as 4:2013cv01829
Plaintiff:
Alvin Randy Pierce
Defendant:
Sheriff Jimmy Harriss, Chief Jailer Matt Martin, Deputy Chief Jailer Tiffany Graham and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Smith et al
as 4:2013cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dale Bennett
Defendant:
Ronald W. Smith and John Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sears v. Graham et al
as 6:2012cv02304
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen Sears
Defendant:
Jackie Graham, Freddy Butler, Holcomb and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)(LEAD)
as 2:2009cv01170
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Glenn Graham
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Harce Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Alabama Department of Corrections (INMATE 2)(MEMBER)
as 2:2009cv01171
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Glenn Graham
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
