Cases 11 - 20 of 41
James Lewis Dixie v. J. Amarillas et al
as 2:2020cv04287
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Poindexter, J. Amarillas and others
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Dixie, - and James Lewis Dixie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Reif et al
as 2:2018cv01088
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Cherokee Brown
Defendant:
C. Reif, S. Overby, J. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Jonathan Gomez v. FBI
as 1:2017cv01719
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Gomez
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackman v. Brown et al
as 2:2017cv01708
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Coleman A Blease, Vance W. Raye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Brown et al
as 1:2017cv00425
Plaintiff:
Ernest Morgan
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., C. Baker, D. Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Jamion Martin
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jacqueline Lashbrook, LaRue Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Westbrook v. David Doughty, et al
as 16-40282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY D. WESTBROOK
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. DOUGHTY, Senior Warden, GARY J. GOMEZ, Region III Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division, In His Individual and Official Capacities, JANIE COCKRELL, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division, In Her Individual and Official Capacities and others
Woods v. Lopez et al
as 3:2015cv05010
Plaintiff:
Barry DeWayne Woods
Defendant:
Joshua R Lopez, Dwayne Meredith, Estelle Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lancaster v. Gomez
as 3:2014cv02852
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lancaster
Defendant:
J. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. McCafferty et al
as 1:2014cv01234
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Landya McCafferty, Joseph N. Laplante, Steven J. McAuliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
