Cases 11 - 20 of 1,306
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Magill et al
as 4:2024cv01946
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brandon-Keith Henry
Defendant:
A.D.A Matthew Magill, A.D.A. Jane Doe #1, A.D.A John Doe / Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trejo v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Mr. Anthony R. Trejo
Defendant:
U.S. President Joe Biden, U.S. Vice President, Texas Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Howard County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jim Bob White
Defendant:
Howard County Sheriffs Office, Simon Munoz, John Doe 1:24-cv-00069 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Felix Fernando Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. John Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Robert Price, Jr
Defendant:
John Doe and Lucas Courrier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mixon v. Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Danny Mixon
Defendant:
Ms. Cross, Mr. Osobrook and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
