Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Moore v. Jordan et al
as 8:2016cv01741
Plaintiff:
Richard Moore
Defendant:
Jordan, Ford, John Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatewood v. Juknelis et al
as 1:2016cv01644
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gatewood
Defendant:
Peter Juknelis, John Wolfe and Stephen T. Moyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pevie v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv03271
Plaintiff:
Terrance Pevie
Defendant:
John Wolfe and La'Tricia Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorensen v. Bishop et al
as 8:2015cv03041
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sorensen
Defendant:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Richard J. Graham, Jr., Michael P. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Marshall v. Ava Joubert
as 15-7334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. AVA JOUBERT, DR. COLIN OTTEY, DR. BOLAJI ONABAJO and others
Defendant:
LT. BRANDON BARNETT, CAPTAIN SHAW, WARDEN JOHN WOLF and others
Reyes v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01433
Plaintiff:
Eric Reyes
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, John Doe, John Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorensen v. Doe et al
as 8:2015cv01198
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sorensen
Defendant:
John Doe, John Hammond, John Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sloan v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2015cv00693
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sloan
Defendant:
John Wolfe, Smith, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Marshall v. Ava Joubert
as 15-6335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. AVA JOUBERT, DR. COLIN OTTEY, DR. RIZVI SYED and others
Defendant:
LT. BRANDON BARNETT, CAPT. SHAW, WARDEN JOHN WOLF and others
Party-in-Interest:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
John Woodlin v. John Wolfe
as 14-7803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WOODLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN WOLFE, Warden, MR. ALLEN GANG, Chief Security, LIEUTENANT HAMILTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
