Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Nye v. King et al
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Jarad Nye
Defendant:
FNU King, FNU LNU, Tracy LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, LIETENANT MCCLURE, N. TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUTPHIN v. CITY OF KING N.C.
as 1:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ALLEN SUTPHIN
Defendant:
CITY OF KING N.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2021cv00913
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, C. SHEETS, S. JARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEBANE v. EDEN POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv00850
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE
Defendant:
EDEN POLICE, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFC. J. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Cox et al
as 5:2021ct03302
Plaintiff:
Alex Ohara King
Defendant:
Detective Jared Cox, Sunset Beach Police Department, Daniel Chris Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. BLACKWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00383
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY ADELE KING
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, CHARLES S. BLACKWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURHAM v. PAGE et al
as 1:2020cv01114
Defendant:
CARLYLE SHERRILL, ROWAN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, GLORIA L. JONES and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON LEE DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durham v. Page et al
as 3:2020cv00672
Defendant:
Carlyle Sherrill, Rowan County District Attorneys Office, Gloria L. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
