Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Hines v. Lockett et al
as 3:2012cv00530
Plaintiff:
Craig Hines
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, J. Bieghley, Jastillano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YARBOROUGH v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00273
Defendant:
J. BEIGHLEY, ASSOCIATE WARDEN T.K. COZZA-RHODES, R.N. MS. DANIEL and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE YARBOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STUDNICKA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS STAFF, DEFENDANTS et al
as 2:2010cv00259
Defendant:
ANNONYMOUS, ANONYMOUS, ANYNOMUS and others
Plaintiff:
MR. SEAN ALLEN STUDNICKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODWIN v. LOCKETT
as 2:2010cv00251
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOODWIN
Defendant:
CHARLES LOCKETT and DR. RUPSKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BRAZIER v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00133
Defendant:
JULIE BEIGHLEY, MRS. COZZI-RHODES, CHARLES LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG BRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRAPER v. HEALTH SERVICES FCC - TH et al
as 2:2009cv00118
Plaintiff:
LAYNE DRAPER
Defendant:
HEALTH SERVICES FCC - TH, ANDY RUPSKA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Migi v. Jett et al
as 1:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Iupeli Migi
Defendant:
B.R. Jett, Webster, H.S.A. Beighley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCINTOSH v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2008cv00414
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
HELEN MARBERRY, BRIAN JETT, JOHN OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PROWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv00364
Plaintiff:
ASHAUNTI Q PROWELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, INCORPORATED, JULIE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCINTOSH v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL MUSKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
