Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Ramos v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00936
Defendant:
Jacob R. Peters, Michael Strickland, Kenneth E. Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ethan Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinchon v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00892
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Kay Ivey, Leigh Gwathney and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lewis Pinchon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00703
Plaintiff:
Toree Jones
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00583
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Jefferson S. Dunn and Charles Tipton
Plaintiff:
Quinton Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Correctional Officer Cunningham, Kenneth Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Ladarius Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00922
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Alcornelia Terry, Kay Ivey, Lynn Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00797
Defendant:
Sherryl Price, Alabama Department of Corrections, Agent Mercado and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Graves, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Dunn et al
as 1:2019cv00057
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Price
Defendant:
Cynthia Stewart and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manuel v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00105
Defendant:
Lynn Head, Kay Ivey and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
De'Angelo Manuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Lynn Head, Ms. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
