Cases 11 - 20 of 80
PATTERSON v. STANLY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
JAMIE TERRY PATTERSON
Defendant:
STANLY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, JEFF CRISCO, SAMANTHA KAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Holmes et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. All filings should be entered in 5:22-CT-3201-FL.
as 5:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Terry F. Thompson
Defendant:
FNU Holmes and FNU Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Thompson v. Holmes et al
as 5:2022ct03201
Plaintiff:
Terry F. Thompson
Defendant:
FNU Holmes and FNU Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
SIMERSON v. BELGER et al
as 1:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
TERRY KEITH SIMERSON
Defendant:
BELGER, JAIL FINANCE, MARY CINDY JOEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMERSON v. TODD et al
as 1:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
TERRY SIMERSON
Defendant:
JONATHAN TODD, SIMMONS, CURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, LIETENANT MCCLURE, N. TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMERSON v. DAVIDSON COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
TERRY SIMERSON
Defendant:
DAVIDSON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laney v. The Sheriff
as 3:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Terry Laney
Defendant:
The Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 5:2022ct03086
Plaintiff:
Terry F. Thompson
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
