Cases 11 - 20 of 843
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Marty D. Williams
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. Cate et al
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Hartley
Defendant:
Nathan Cate, Criminal Court Clerk's Office, Central Records Division (Metro Police Department) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Southern Health Partners
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Willard William Wright
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooden v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
John H. Wooden and Jabari I. Mandela
Defendant:
William Lee, David Raush, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell v. Claiborne et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Michael C Russell
Defendant:
Ray Claiborne, Matt Bolton, Angie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Datrin Travis
Defendant:
Sarah-Ann Williams, Chief T. Conrad, A. Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bailey v Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jamie Bailey
Defendant:
Tiffany Williams, Logan Edwards, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
William Charles Parker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arzadon v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Sebastian William Arzadon
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
