Cases 21 - 30 of 815
Krug v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Krug
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Ms. Beth Cabell, Mr. Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks, Jr. v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Bernard Lee Starks, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Kevin McCoy, A. Wethington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Bourne
as 3:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
Rodrik Clark
Defendant:
R. Bourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Jervod Simmons
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, Lt. K. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralston v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Andy Ralston
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, M. Davis, E.D. Sales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peyton v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jacob Douglas Peyton
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson, Warden Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00710
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Harold Clarke and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
