Cases 21 - 30 of 42
McClary v. Solomon et al
as 5:2015ct03219
Plaintiff:
Ronald McClary
Defendant:
George Solomon and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Solomon et al
as 5:2015ct03196
Plaintiff:
Willie James Dean, Jr.
Defendant:
George Solomon, Carlton Joyner, Dean Doering and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsay v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv00326
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jervon Lindsay
Defendant:
A. Smith, FNU Ingrum, FNU Parker and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
American Humanist Association et al v. Frank L. Perry et al
as 5:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
American Humanist Association and Kwame Jamal Teague
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
American Humanist Association et al v. Frank L. Perry et al
as 5:2015ct03053
Plaintiff:
American Humanist Association and Kwame Jamal Teague
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CITY v. SOLOMON et al
as 1:2015cv00143
Plaintiff:
SIN YORK CITY
Defendant:
GEORGE SOLOMON and FRANK PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Lazurus Wright
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Ken Beaver, FNU Parker and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Solomon et al
as 5:2014ct03309
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Williams, Lorenzo Graham, Curtis Wise and others
Defendant:
George Solomon, John Carbone, Tricia Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacock v. Solomon et al
as 5:2014ct03234
Plaintiff:
Tryphon D. Peacock
Defendant:
George Solomon, NC Department of Public Safety, Sgt. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Leggett v. Solomon et al
as 5:2014ct03228
Plaintiff:
Orlander D. Leggett
Defendant:
George Solomon, Jackie Parker, Chaplain Hovis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
