Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Whipper v. Erfe et al
as 3:2018cv00347
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Whipper
Defendant:
Scott Erfe, Angel Quiros, Amonda Hannah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seiler v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv01240
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Seiler
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Watson and Scott Erfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seiler v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv01174
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Seiler
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Cossette, Eberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seiler v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv01172
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Seiler
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Jennifer Deko, Rious and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Pierre
as 16-3470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Chambers
Defendant - Appellee:
John Pierre, James Watson, Individual and Official Capacities, Jon Brighthaupt, Warden, Individual and Official Capacities and others
Defendant:
Fitzner, ARC, Individual and Official Capacities, Scott Semple, Deputy Commissioner, Individual and Official Capacities and Jennifer Peterson, C/S, Individual and Official Capacities
Watson v. Farnham et al
as 2:2016cv02259
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
Karl Farnham, Jeff Wood and John Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Wood
as 2:2016cv02254
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
Jeff Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Watson v. Bobby Ephlin, et al
as 16-3263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Watson
Defendant - Appellee:
Bobby Ephlin, Sgt. Second Judicial District Drug Task Force, Grant Barnett, Sgt. Second Judicial District Drug Task Force, Chris Lassley, Sgt. Second Judicial District Drug Task Force and others
Watson v. Farnham et al
as 2:2016cv02247
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
Karl Farnham, Jeff Wood and John Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Farnham et al
as 2:2016cv02241
Plaintiff:
James . Watson
Defendant:
Karl Farnham, Jeff Wood and John Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
