Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Preacher, et al v. Wiley, et al
as 09-1493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUKE PREACHER
Plaintiff:
DAVID BAXTER, AKA Richie Antonio Hall and DAWANE MALLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RON WILEY, Warden ADX-Florence, B. A. BLEDSOE, Warden USP Marion, J. FOX, Associate Warden ADX-Florence and others
Mark Collins v. A. Schwarzenegger
as 2:2009cv00305
Plaintiff:
Mark Collins
Defendant:
A. Schwarzenegger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Mark Collins v. A Schwarzennegger
as 5:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
Mark Collins
Defendant:
A Schwarzennegger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Mark Collins v. Arnold Schwarzennegger
as 5:2007cv01440
Plaintiff:
Mark Collins
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzennegger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Custard v. Lappin, et al
as 07-1371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOB ALLEN CUSTARD
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, HARRELL WATTS, R. WILEY and others
Smith v. Dominguez et al
as 3:2007cv00368
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cordell Smith
Defendant:
Roy Dominguez, Jeffrey Stozek, A Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Collins v. A. Scwarzeneggar
as 5:2007cv00529
Petitioner:
Mark Collins
Respondent:
A Scwarzeneggar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custard v. Lappin et al
as 1:2007cv00844
Plaintiff:
Bob Allen Custard
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Harrell Watts, K. Rear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUSTARD v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2007cv00538
Plaintiff:
BOB ALLEN CUSTARD
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, HARRELL WATTS, MICHAEL K. NALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Collins v. CDC Director et al
as 5:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
Mark Collins
Defendant:
CDC Director and A Schwarzeneggar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
