Cases 21 - 30 of 117
Cullum et al v. Davis et al
as 3:2015cv00057
Plaintiff:
Detrick Cullum, Marquise Craig, Donald Williams and others
Defendant:
C/O Davis, C/O Nalley, Louis Browder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burdine v. People of State of California et al
as 3:2015cv00233
Plaintiff:
Leon Landon Burdine
Defendant:
Nalley Kandkhovova, Lonck and Kittey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILTON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv02673
Plaintiff:
GREGORY A. MILTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF PRISONS, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nosair v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2013cv01017
Plaintiff:
El-Sayyid Nosair
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Leslie Smith, D Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amawi v. Walton et al
as 3:2013cv00866
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Zaki Amawi
Defendant:
J. S. Walton, D Scott Dodrill, Brian K Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez v. Nalley et al
as 3:2013cv00656
Plaintiff:
Cesar Ramirez
Defendant:
Nalley and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Roecheman et al
as 3:2013cv00535
Plaintiff:
Cesar Ramirez
Defendant:
Zachary Roecheman, Zindy Gee, Salvador Anthony Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stine v. Lappin, et al
as 13-1164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director B.O.P., MICHAEL NALLEY, Regional Director B.O.P. and RON WILEY, Warden ADX Supermax
MILTON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv00083
Plaintiff:
GREGORY A. MILTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
