Cases 21 - 30 of 150
Andrade v. United States Supreme Court Justice
as 1:2019cv12131
Defendant:
United States Supreme Court Justice
Plaintiff:
Antone Andrade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evariste v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv11996
Defendant:
State of Massachuestts, United States of America and Thomas Hodgson
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Evariste
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almeda v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2019cv12275
Defendant:
Dr. Sharig Ahmad, Warden S. Spaulding, Kevin Elker and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Almeda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv11805
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarthy v. Koutoujian et al
as 1:2019cv11533
Defendant:
Peter Koutoujian, Superintendent o Osvaldo Vidal, Massachusetts State Parole and others
Plaintiff:
William D. McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddington v. United States of America (BOP) et al
as 1:2019cv11232
Defendant:
William Tidwell, Stephen Spaulding, C. Makowicz and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eddington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hatik v. State of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2019cv11560
Defendant:
Officer Kaiser and State of Massachusetts
Plaintiff:
Hamza Hatik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2019cv10821
Defendant:
Consolidated Legal Center, Cynthia Young, US Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinkfield v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2019cv10776
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Devens, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Maurice Sinkfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evariste v. State of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2019cv10727
Defendant:
Officer Velez and State of Massachusetts
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Evariste
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
