Cases 21 - 30 of 3,442
Brown v. Ladner et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Rickey Brown
Defendant:
Cody Ladner, Taylor Igleheart and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putney v. Ross et al
as 1:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Stedrick Levelee Putney, Sr. and Stedrick Levelle Putney, Sr.
Defendant:
Circuit Judge Quincey Ross, Tad Huntsman, Prosecuting Attorney Sandra Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. U Haul
as 4:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Derrick Wade Smith
Defendant:
U Haul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGown v. Gardner et al
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Sedric Lamont McGown
Defendant:
Ann E Gardner and Willard Proctor, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neice v. City of Van Buren, Arkansas
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Richard William Neice
Defendant:
City of Van Buren, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024cv05093
Plaintiff:
Zerahzhe Authentic Tate
Defendant:
Officer J. Jackson, Special Agent Devito and John or Jane Doe Officers or Agents #1 to #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ketcher v. White et al
as 5:2024cv05090
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Ketcher
Defendant:
Deputy White and Deputy Venasula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putney v. Huntsman et al
as 1:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
Stedrick L Putney, Sr
Defendant:
Tad Huntsman, Frank Spain, Prosecuting Attorney Sandra Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooperwood v. Tripp
as 4:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cooperwood
Defendant:
Arden Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
