Cases 31 - 40 of 314
Seamon v. Barnes et al
as 5:2023ct03098
Plaintiff:
George Seamon
Defendant:
FNU Barnes, FNU Mullins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. DOES et al
as 1:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
JOHN DOES and JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMAN v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOL LAW ENFORCEMENT, ET AL.,
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
QUENTON DAMON HOLMAN
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOL LAW ENFORCEMENT, A.T. WIGGS, K. KLUTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Letterlough v. Clark et al
as 5:2023ct03042
Plaintiff:
Derrick Derrail Letterlough
Defendant:
Demetrius A. Clark, Ja'Maar Watson and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMA ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HONEYCUTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DOE
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddle v. Yancey County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Riddle
Defendant:
Yancey County Sheriffs Office, Levi Johnson and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. Mecklenburg County Jail et al
as 5:2022ct03460
Plaintiff:
John M Copeland
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Jail, Sheriff Garry McFadden, Medical Staff John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. BLUE et al
as 1:2022cv01134
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
MR. BLUE and MR. JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DOE
as 1:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
