Cases 31 - 40 of 400
Benn v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Anthony Deray Benn #673273
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Ayesha Syed and S. Bergman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Menefee v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv10024
Plaintiff:
Rico Menefee
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Kristin Mason, Dian and others
Benn, Jr. v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv13151
Plaintiff:
Anthony Deray Benn, Jr.
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Ayesha Syed, S. Bergman and others
Dickens v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv13053
Plaintiff:
Everege Vernor Dickens
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Chandler Cheeks, Hohn and others
Ryan v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv13002
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Healthcare, Inc. and others
Parker v. Michigan Department of Corrections State Prison et al
as 2:2022cv12891
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Parker
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections State Prison, Macomb Correctional Facility Correctional Officers, Brown and others
Webster v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv12847
Plaintiff:
Mark Webster
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Chapman, Jenkins and others
Webster v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv12848
Plaintiff:
Mark Webster
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Chapman, G. Stephenson and others
Smith #267009 v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Derrick Lee Smith #267009
Defendant:
Jason Scott Jones, Jennifer Ann Foster, H. Steven Langschwager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whaley-El v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv12725
Plaintiff:
Kevin Arnaz Whaley-El
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Mr. Dorris and J. Bugbee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
