Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Grant v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01024
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Defendant:
Kim Thomas and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michael Mays
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00503
Plaintiff:
Michael James Craig
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Joseph Headley, Ossie Brown and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
Allan Williams
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Thomas et al
as 5:2013cv01365
Plaintiff:
Rashad C Lee
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, James Deloach, Grant Culliver and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Cooks et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2013cv00483
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Brown
Defendant:
Mary Cooks , Micheal Adair , Stanley Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jemison v. Culliver et al
as 4:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Grant Culliver, Carter Davenport, Patrice Richie and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv02491
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
Clyde E Jones, Brandon K Falls, Anne Marie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Culliver et al
as 4:2011cv02198
Plaintiff:
Kenny D Holmes
Defendant:
Grant Culliver, Davenport, LaTonya Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Hardy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv01064
Defendant:
A. J. Hardy, Warden Hopkins and City of Montgomery
Plaintiff:
Willie Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
