Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Canada v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00369
Defendant:
D. Ball, Grant Bledsoe, Blevins and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin A. Canada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gholson v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 7:2011cv00371
Defendant:
Sgt. Anthony Adam, George Allen, Ronald Angelone and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie McDonovan Gholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Schilling et al
as 7:2011cv00255
Defendant:
Tony Adams, James Bentley, Amy Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00250
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, John Garman, Sgt. Chris Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont O. Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donohue v. Ray et al
as 7:2011cv00227
Defendant:
Harris L. Diggs, Tracy Ray, Sgt. E. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
John P. Donohue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DePaola v. Wade et al
as 7:2011cv00198
Plaintiff:
Eric Joseph DePaola
Defendant:
Lt. Lafayette Fleming, John Garman, B. Osbourne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdul-Mateen v. Phipps et al
as 7:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Khalif Abdul-Mateen
Defendant:
Vicki Phipps, Tracy Ray and Fred Schilling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DePaola v. Fleming et al
as 7:2010cv00561
Plaintiff:
Eric Joseph DePaola
Defendant:
Leslie Fleming, John Jabe, Publication Review Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Barbour v. Taxe
as 10-7443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
TAXES, VIRGINIA DEPT. OF CORR. OFFENDER TRUST SYSTEM, BRYAN WATSON and others
Kenneth Barbour v. Tracy Ray
as 10-7439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACY RAY, GENE M. JOHNSON and PUBLIC SURVEILLANCE CAMERA'S - IOP 851 ROSP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
