Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Cherry v. Circuit Court of Madison, The et al
as 5:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
Danny William Cherry
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Madison, The, Karen Hall, D E O'Dell and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barkley v. City of Dothan et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00891
Plaintiff:
Andrew Keith Barkley
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Magistrates Office, Mamie McCory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barkley v. City of Dothan, et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2011cv00891
Plaintiff:
Andrew Keith Barkley
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Magistrates Office, Mamie McCory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. City of Reform Police Department et al
as 7:2011cv03413
Plaintiff:
Andrew Brent Edwards
Defendant:
City of Reform Police Department and Jeff Floyd
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2010cv03171
Plaintiff:
Deric Brian Conner
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell, Andrew Jairam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Andrews et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2010cv00902
Plaintiff:
Demarlos Davis
Defendant:
Max Andrews, Butch Benford and Judge White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. City of Reform Police Department et al
as 7:2010cv02675
Plaintiff:
Andrew Brent Edwards
Defendant:
City of Reform Police Department and Jeff Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mead v. DeCarlo et al
as 7:2010cv00139
Plaintiff:
Wesley Mead
Defendant:
John P. DeCarlo, M. David Barber, Glen L. Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentley v. Limestone County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2009cv00544
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lynn Bentley
Defendant:
Limestone County Detention Facility, Mike Blakely, Brenda Pack and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Myers v. Roden et al
as 5:2008cv00647
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Myers
Defendant:
Tyler Roden, Ed Pottor and Raley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
