Cases 41 - 50 of 219
Ates v. Barnard et al
as 1:2016cv01586
Plaintiff:
Casey Ates
Defendant:
Terry E. Barnard, Braxton T. Cotton, Iris Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridley v. Doe et al
as 1:2016cv00835
Plaintiff:
Edward Tyrone Ridley
Defendant:
John Doe, James W. Mills, Lacey Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Owens et al
as 1:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jason Carter
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Bruce Chatman and Sharon Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. All Parole Board Members et al
as 1:2016cv00238
Plaintiff:
Craig L. Jones
Defendant:
All Parole Board Members, Terry E. Barnard, James W. Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv04492
Plaintiff:
Donald Frank Smith
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Brian Owens, Ricky Myrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berrong v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2015cv02497
Plaintiff:
Chon Berrong
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, VOYA Financial, Metro Atlanta Ambulance Service, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torrance v. Bryson et al
as 1:2015cv02141
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ralph Torrance
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Brian Owens, Stan Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frymyer v. Owens et al
as 1:2015cv01561
Plaintiff:
James Cable Frymyer
Defendant:
Brian Owens and Crickmire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2015cv01117
Plaintiff:
Julius Everett Henderson, Jr.
Defendant:
George F. Hutchinson , III, Gwinnett County, Justin Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali et al v. The Prince George's Co. et al
as 8:2015cv00668
Petitioner:
Seifullah A Ali, Eric Gibson and Brian Owens
Respondent:
The Prince George's Co., Department of Corrections, MD and Prince George's Co. Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
