Cases 41 - 50 of 794
McGrew v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGrew
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Bryan Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavett v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Juan Garcia, C Eppeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Collier
as 23-20547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Oscar Mendoza, Assistant Executive Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Williams v. Burleson County, Texas et al
as 1:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Burleson County, Texas, Gene Hermes, Judge Reva L. Townslee Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palomo v. Collier
as 23-40636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reynaldo Palomo
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Evelyn Castro and others
Cobb v. Collier et al
as 7:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birdow v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Austin D. Birdow
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and C.F. Hazlewood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaffney v. Collier
as 23-40622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul Sean Gaffney
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, April Zamora, Eric Pichardo and others
Cobb v. Collier et al;
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowley v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Michael Crowley
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Sammiego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
