Cases 41 - 50 of 78
BAILEY v. GRAHAM et al
as 1:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
P. J. GRAHAM and NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. TOMIN et al
as 1:2016cv00273
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. TOMIN, JR., R.M. ASHLEY, K.D. MORLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00245
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C.C. BLAKE, R.M ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vandyke v. US District Court Administration et al
as 1:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Vandyke
Defendant:
US District Court Administration, Clerks of Court, Rutherford County Court, Lacy Thornburg and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
COMPTON v. US GOVERNMENT/USA et al
as 1:2015cv00904
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT/USA, ERIC HOLDER, GRAHAM GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COMPTON v. US GOVERNMENT/USA et al
as 1:2015cv00798
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT/USA, GRAHAM GREEN, ATF, ETAL AGENTS UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COMPTON v. GREEN et al
as 1:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
GRAHAM GREEN, AMES CHAMBERLIN, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Shandles et al
as 5:2015ct03106
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stout, Jr.
Defendant:
Debra Shandles, Elizabeth Graham and Wake County Court of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Duall et al
as 5:2015ct03078
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stout, Jr.
Defendant:
Tami Duall and Elizabeth Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 5:2015ct03003
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
James E. Graham, Stephen J. Murphy, III, A. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
