Cases 41 - 50 of 196
Cruise v. State of Alabama
as 1:2018cv00524
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Judge Ben Brooks and Steve Marshall
Plaintiff:
Harold David Cruise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotner v. Johnson (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00764
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Russell County Jail, Steve Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Edward Cotner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Freddrick et al
as 2:2018cv01334
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Freddrick
Petitioner:
Gerald Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Circuit Court of Madison County et al
as 5:2018cv00741
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Idris Wilson
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Madison County, State of Alabama, STAC Team and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Striegel v. State of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00456
Plaintiff:
Charles Stephen Striegel
Defendant:
State of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnifield v. State of Alabama et al
as 7:2018cv00681
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Minnifield
Defendant:
State of Alabama, David Bolwer and Charles Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanberry v. State of Alabama et al
as 4:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Derrick Michael Stanberry
Defendant:
State of Alabama and K Ivy
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Striegel v. State of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 6:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
Charles Striegel
Defendant:
State of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Alabama v. Johns (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00860
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
Charles Kelvin Johns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Bailey et al
as 5:2017cv01500
Plaintiff:
Chelson D'Angelo T Goodwin
Defendant:
Brandon Bailey, Anna Franklin, Morgan County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
