Cases 41 - 50 of 81
EARLY v. SHEPHERD et al
as 2:2016cv00085
Defendant:
IAN CONNORS, PAUL M. LAIRD, LEANN LARIVA and others
Plaintiff:
LOUIS H. EARLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
EVANS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EVANS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sheneman v. United States of America et al
as 3:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jeremie Sheneman
Defendant:
United States of America, Jon E DeGuilio, David Capp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHENEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv00008
Defendant:
JESSE BARRETT, BARBARA BROOK, DAVID CAPP and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIE SHENEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLISON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv00385
Plaintiff:
KYLE ELLISON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARTHUR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv00326
Plaintiff:
BRENT LELAND ARTHUR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
BURGESS v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2015cv00308
Defendant:
ASSOCIATE WARDENS, BOATRIGHT, BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
COREY BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BROOKS v. SAMUELS
as 2:2015cv00234
Plaintiff:
CHARLES AARON BROOKS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RASHID MUHAMMAD v. RUPSKA et al
as 2:2015cv00228
Defendant:
HEATHER ATTERBURY, T. BAILEY, LIEUTENANT CHRISTOPHER BLILA and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BROOKS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2015cv00080
Defendant:
Mr. BLAIR, Mr. CASTENA, Mr. CASTENEDA and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES AARON BROOKS
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
