Cases 51 - 60 of 148
Kenneth Barbour v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director for Virginia Department of Corrections, BRYAN WATSON, Warden and MCBRIBE, Investigator at WRSP
Kenneth Barbour v. Lieutenant Burgin
as 10-7273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BURGIN, SERGEANT COLLINS, C/O FRANKLIN and others
Kenneth Barbour v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, VDOC's Director, BYRON WATSON, Warden, WRSP and INVESTIGATOR MCBRIBE
Kenneth Barbour v. Afarensis Standford
as 10-7274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
AFARENSIS STANDFORD, GENE M. JOHNSON, BRYON WATSON and others
Kenneth Barbour v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON and BRYAN WATSON
Whitehouse v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv01175
Plaintiff:
Colin D. Whitehouse
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John M. Jabe, Daniel T. Mahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehouse v. Levin et al
as 1:2010cv01021
Plaintiff:
Colin D. Whitehouse
Defendant:
Leonard Levin, L. Burrell, B. Syder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbour v. Ray et al
as 7:2010cv00401
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Public Surveillance Camera's -IOP 851 ROSP and Tracy Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Johnson et al
as 7:2010cv00395
Defendant:
Cheeks, Cochrane, Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv00984
Plaintiff:
Marvin Gaye Robinson
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, J.C. White, M. Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
