Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Brooks v. Lewis et al
as 1:2018cv00161
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Paula Reed, Jason Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Perry et al
as 2:2018cv11588
Plaintiff:
Dallas Jason Lewis
Defendant:
Perry, Moore, Rushford and others
Coleman v. Lewis et al
as 1:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
John H. Coleman
Defendant:
Jason Lewis, Omar Clark, Paula Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Lewis
as 1:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
James H. Hamilton
Defendant:
Jason Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon N. Barnett v. Jason Lewis, et al
as 1:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Brandon Nicholas Barnett
Defendant:
Jason Lewis, Paula Reed, Anne L. Precythe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Lewis, et al
as 1:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Cory D. Bradley
Defendant:
Jason Lewis, Anne L. Precythe and Lynn Bock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hemingway v. Shelton et al
as 1:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Lamon Taneal Hemingway, Sr.
Defendant:
Caleb Shelton, Molly Fields, Trevor Proffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nethery v. Lewis
as 4:2017cv00268
Petitioner:
Randall Lamar Nethery
Respondent:
Jason Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chance v. Lewis et al
as 1:2016cv00286
Plaintiff:
Jason Chance
Defendant:
Jason Lewis, Bruce Hanabrick, Omar Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnell Bell, I v. George Lombardi, et al
as 16-3833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johnell A. Bell, I
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, Director of Missouri Department of Corrections, Individually and Officially, Dwayne Kempker, Terry Russell, Warden, ERDCC, Individually and Officially and others
Defendant:
Don Roper, FUM, ERDCC, (Retired), Individually and Officially, Tina Coffman, Nurse, ERDCC, Individually and Officially, John Montgomery, FUM, ERDCC, Individually and Officially and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
