Cases 51 - 60 of 251
SANTIAGO v. ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2021cv05415
Plaintiff:
RICKY HENRY SANTIAGO
Defendant:
ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER KAREN DEVINE, OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv02020
Plaintiff:
Ruben Craig, III
Defendant:
Secretary John Wetzel, Superintendent Kevin Ransom, Deputy Superintendent Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERCHA v. SPICER et al
as 2:2021cv05011
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PERCHA
Defendant:
MICHAEL E. SPICER, OFFICER JOHN DOE 1, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RISTER v. MEYER et al
as 2:2021cv05058
Plaintiff:
TARRELL R. RISTER
Defendant:
GREGORY MEYER, MICHAEL T. LAVERGHETTA, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwartz v. Lackwanna County et al
as 4:2021cv01645
Plaintiff:
Molly M. Schwartz
Defendant:
Lackwanna County, Lackawanna County Prison Board, Lackawanna County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
STAWARZ v. WEBB et al
as 3:2021cv01393
Plaintiff:
Walter Stawarz
Defendant:
Sgt. Webb and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colyer v. County of Mifflin et al
as 3:2021cv01117
Defendant:
Kurtz, Unknown Medical Providers John Does 1-10, Beaver and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas T. Colyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HECKER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2021cv02701
Defendant:
SEARGENT WHARTON, JIMMY KIMMEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R HECKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
