Cases 71 - 80 of 794
Murphy v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv03033
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah Isaac Murphy
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Kelly Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McGee v. Armstrong
as 23-50571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rickey L. McGee
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden Bruce L. Armstrong, Major Michael Voyles, Major Treyvon Hoecult and others
Crowley v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Crowley
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Asst Warden Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tyler v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Tyler, Jr
Defendant:
Adam R Gonzales, Bryan Collier, Logan T Shedd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Tyler, Jr
Defendant:
Adam R Gonzales, Bryan Collier, Logan T Shedd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Jasso
as 23-40446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Abel Jasso, Luiz Garcia, Elbert Holmes and others
Weaver v. Smith et al
as 7:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Michael Doc Weaver
Defendant:
Jimmy Smith, David Reitsma, Tina S. Vitolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego, Dr Issac Kwarteng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weaver et al v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv02677
Plaintiff:
Michael Doc Weaver, Danny Garner and Jimmy Oakley
Defendant:
Jimmy Smith, David Reitsma, Tina S. Vitolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fontenot v. Ernestinen et al
as 4:2023cv02599
Plaintiff:
Chester Gerard Fontenot
Defendant:
Julye Ernestinen and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
