Cases 81 - 90 of 475
Price v. Quarterman et al
as 5:2009cv00153
Plaintiff:
Danny Price
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Staraks M Cos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Livingston et al
as 1:2009cv00740
Plaintiff:
Gerald Anthony Wright
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, William H. Brooks, Nathaniel Quarterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irwin v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv03224
Plaintiff:
Darrell Irwin
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irwin v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00240
Plaintiff:
Darrell Irwin
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cline v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2009cv00445
Plaintiff:
Danny Cline
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Pamela Williams, Unknown Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Quarterman et al
as 2:2009cv00271
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Williams
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, John Doe, Eldarado Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cline v. Quarterman et al
as 4:2009cv03174
Plaintiff:
Danny Cline
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Pamela Williams, Unknown Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert Damian v. Victor Ross, et al
as 09-20627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT SANTOS DAMIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
VICTOR ROSS and NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Crayton v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 2:2009cv00239
Plaintiff:
Lee Crayton
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Executive Board of Pardons and Paroles, Gregg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Gunnels et al
as 4:2009cv03068
Plaintiff:
LaDavid B Taylor
Defendant:
Richard A Gunnels, Markete Miller, Thomas L Hutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
