Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Kelly v. York County Prison et al
as 4:2008cv02027
Plaintiff:
Allen Kelly
Defendant:
York County Prison, Mary Sabol, Claire Doll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudacille v. Hoke et al
as 4:2008cv01718
Plaintiff:
Brent Ian Rudacille
Defendant:
Doug Hoke, Stanley Rebert, Richard Keuerleber and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROGERS v. J. et al
as 2:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. ROGERS
Defendant:
R. J., SMITT, TERRI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mincy v. Klem et al
as 1:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Hilton Karriem Mincy
Defendant:
Edward Klem, William C. Wetzel, Miknich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHES v. DYKSTRA et al
as 2:2007cv01740
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
LENNY DYKSTRA, GARY SHEFFIELD, DAVID JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHES v. NFL NETWORK et al
as 2:2007cv05352
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
NFL NETWORK, NFL TOTAL ACCESS, NFL.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Laguna et al
as 4:2007cv01919
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Nelson
Defendant:
Roger R. Laguna, Michael L. Rozman and Todd A. Hoover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv01398
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. ALLEN
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOHN SHAFFER, FRED MAUE, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DURONIO v. GONZALES et al
as 3:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
ROGER F. DURONIO
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, HARLEY LAPPIN, JOHN YOST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Strada et al
as 4:2007cv00437
Plaintiff:
Miles Orlando Lee
Defendant:
Strada, Mr. Shilo, Adami and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
