Cases 1 - 10 of 58
TAYLOR v. BOLIN et al
as 2:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
JARARD AMOS TAYLOR
Defendant:
NINA BOLIN, URSULA DEAN, STERLING HICKERSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Weller v. Prime Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Ronald Weller
Defendant:
Prime Care, Inc., Michelle Young and Dawn Bentivegna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coit v. Malichaik et al
as 1:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
L. Malichaik, Bobbi Jo Salomon, M. Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Baylor et al
as 3:2021cv00613
Defendant:
Patty Manfre and Lea Baylor
Plaintiff:
Dawn Marie Ball and Dawn Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALL v. CONRAD et al
as 2:2021cv01414
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW DERENICK and POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL J. CONRAD
Plaintiff:
DAWN BALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALL v. KIRBY
as 2:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
DAWN BALL and CHRISTIN BALL
Defendant:
MARK A. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guthrie v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv02351
Defendant:
Dr. Paul Noel, Dr. Arlene Seid, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Guthrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNIDER v. ALVAREZ et al
as 3:2020cv00241
Respondent:
Officer Heckert, C/O KILLEEN, Captain Eichenberg and others
Defendant:
ROBIN ALVAREZ and STEVENS
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SAULTZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL. JOSH SHAPIRO ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2019cv05778
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, OFFICER DAWN HEUSER, BADGE #439, SPECIAL AGENT ERIC J. BARLOW and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW SAULTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
