Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Babineau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
James A. Babeneau
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Hale et al
as 2:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Alton Cromartie
Defendant:
Dr. Arthur Hale, Mary Roush, Ashley Orsbone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Hale et al
as 1:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Robert Bates
Defendant:
Stephen Hale, Joshua Kinner, Travis Wellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Robert Bates
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Annette Chambers-Smith, Ron Erdos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Garnett et al
as 3:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Tom Lynch, Curtis Jones, Officer Strickler and others
Plaintiff:
Camilia T Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilmot v. Butler County Jail et al
as 1:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Sgt. Benjamen, Sgt Burkeit, Dep. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Jayson D. Wilmot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Eddy et al
as 2:2019cv03388
Defendant:
Yolanda Ewing, Phillip Rice, Dr. Jerry Smacker and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bullocks v. C/O Hale et al
as 1:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Gerald Bullocks
Defendant:
Stephen Hale and Gary Hunley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sales v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv00689
Plaintiff:
Arkmael Ray Sales
Defendant:
Arthur Hale, Mary Lawrence, Roger Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Mason
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, Missy Roush, Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
