Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Exum v. L.T. Donna et al
as 1:2023cv02888
Plaintiff:
Eric Exum and Eric Ricardo Exum
Defendant:
L.T. Donna, Sgt. Jordan, CO. 2 Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Prince George's Department of Correction et al
as 1:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Enrico Miller Brown
Defendant:
Prince George's Department of Correction, Private Warr, Capt. Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Morency v. Uguru et al
as 1:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
Jean Morency
Defendant:
Emole Uguru, John and Jane Doe 1-10, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Seltzer et al
as 1:2021cv03048
Plaintiff:
Wayne Arthur Jordan
Defendant:
Tom Seltzer, West, Vanessa Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jordan v. Warden Bivens et al
as 1:2021cv02934
Plaintiff:
Wayne Arthur Jordan
Defendant:
Warden Bivens, Warden Weber, Dr. Choudry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brooks v. Watts et al
as 1:2021cv01901
Plaintiff:
Jordan Alexander Brooks
Defendant:
Gail Watts and Sgt. A. Dupree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McFadden v. Montley
as 1:2021cv01142
Defendant:
CO II Montley, Lt. John Doe, Sgt. Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Allen M. McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Polston v. Commission of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00856
Defendant:
Warden, Commission of Corrections and Officer Sanusi
Plaintiff:
Jordan R. Polston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Jordon v. Commissioner of Correction and DPSCS
as 1:2020cv03595
Defendant:
Commissioner of Correction and DPSCS
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Jordon and Wayne A. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Barber v. Burnett et al.
as 1:2020cv02611
Plaintiff:
Charles Barber
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (DPSCS), Oluwasegun Fashae, Philipe Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
