Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JAMES v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN JAMES and MICHEAL JOHN JAMES
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY, GLEN BROWN, SUE CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2017cv00357
Plaintiff:
JON ROBERT ADAMS
Defendant:
SCOTT R LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, SCOTT MCCAFFERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROSS v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
BRANDON M GROSS
Defendant:
SCOTT R LANDRY, GLEAN BROWN, SUSAN CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MACK BATTLE, JR
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SOMERSET COUNTY, STATE OF MAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWNE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv00619
Plaintiff:
ALBION SAVAGE BROWNE
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER SECURITY STAFF and MEDICAL STAFF AND PROVIDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHOFF v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 2:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R SCHOFF, JR
Defendant:
JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, JODY BRETON, SCOTT LANDRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
JON R ADAMS
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, SCOTT MCCAFFERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. OXFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 1:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
JASON M BROWN
Defendant:
OXFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WIDI v. MCNEIL et al
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
DAVID J WIDI, JR
Defendant:
PAUL MCNEIL, STEPHEN E HICKEY, JR, CHRISTOPHER J DURKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 1:2007cv00061
Plaintiff:
DEANE BROWN
Defendant:
MARTIN MAGNUSSON , JEFFREY MERRILL , JAMES O'FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
