Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Diaz v. State of Rhode Island et al.
as 1:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Diaz
Defendant:
Attorney General Peter F. Neronha, Superior Court Mag. Richard Rospallo, Defense Attorney Thomas Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaye v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant:
United States, US Attorney General Merrick Brian Garland, County of Union and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Ann Jaye
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Silva v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv00012
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Dangerous Fugitives Task Force of, William E. Smith, C.J. Wyatt and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2019cv00458
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Cloud, Investigator Cabral, Lieutenant Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Julio E. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotto v. Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jose Cotto
Defendant:
Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation, AVCORR Management, LLC, MVF Consulting LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Bailey et al
as 1:2012cv00062
Defendant:
Nancy Bailey, William Divine, Robert McClutcheon and others
Plaintiff:
Deaven E. Tucker, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. Chafee et al
as 1:2011cv00586
Plaintiff:
Parrish Chase
Defendant:
Lincoln Chafee, David Fathi, Alvin J. Bronstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willard
as 1:2009cv00401
Plaintiff:
Seth E Willard
Defendant:
Curtis Marco, Richard R Destefano, Jr. and Aida Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laurence v. Wall et al
as 1:2008cv00109
Plaintiff:
Norman Laurence
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Jake Gadsen, James Weeden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tucker v. Wall et al
as 1:2007cv00406
Plaintiff:
Deaven E. Tucker
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Jake Gadsden, Tony Amaral and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
