Cases 1 - 10 of 33
MARTIN et al v. HOLT et al
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Judge BEVERLY B MARTIN, Khalid Mouton and BEVERLY B MARTIN
Defendant:
PO AHMED HOLT, ROBERT TOOLE, STAN SHEPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, FACILITIES DIRECTOR JACK KOON, JOHNNY SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARLOW v. BOBITT et al
as 7:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant:
Warden BOBITT, Ms SHARPE, Mr SPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bobbitt et al
as 6:2021cv00022
Defendant:
Ochipinti, Trevonza Bobbitt, Wanada Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Eric OBrien Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAYTON v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2020cv00188
Defendant:
DARREN JACKSON, SHAWN EMMONS, BRANDON SHARPE and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRADFORD LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LESLIE v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Lt MCDOUGLE, HEATHER A DAVIS, Warden SHAWN EMMONS and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE KYEVONNIE LESLIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKERSON v. ZIRKEL et al
as 7:2020cv00008
Defendant:
COII STEWART, COII SHARP, COII WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
TAURUS BERNARD DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. SHARP et al
as 7:2019cv00149
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
P SMITH, DIXON, H COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
