Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wright v. Moniz, et al
as 24-1632
Defendant:
ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent and MELVIN SPRAGUE, Assistant Superintendent
Plaintiff:
DAVID DAOUD WRIGHT
Miranda Pizarro v. McDonald et al
as 1:2024cv11547
Plaintiff:
Johanns Miranda Pizarro
Defendant:
Sheriff Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. and Superintendent Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harrison v. Plymouth County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv11347
Plaintiff:
Melik Harrison
Defendant:
Plymouth County Sheriffs Department, Antone Moniz and Lotterhand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel v. McDonald et al
as 1:2022cv10571
Plaintiff:
Stephon Samuel
Defendant:
Joseph D. McDonald, Jr., Superintendent Antone Moniz, Ralph Mattarello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Plymouth County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2021cv12096
Plaintiff:
Malik D Harrison
Defendant:
Plymouth County Sheriff Department, Oliver and Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Jane Doe et al
as 1:2021cv10137
Plaintiff:
David Daoud Wright
Defendant:
Antone Moniz, Melvin Sprague and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tabia v. Lyons et al
as 1:2019cv12594
Defendant:
Steven Souza, Antone Moniz, Todd Lyons and others
Plaintiff:
Guillaume Tabia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Correctional Psychiatric Services et al
as 1:2018cv12324
Defendant:
Correctional Psychiatric Services, Joseph McDonald, Melvin Sprague and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Higgins O'Brien et al
as 1:2016cv11064
Plaintiff:
Cleon Riley
Defendant:
Carol Higgins O'Brien, Lois Russo, William Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Higgins O'Brien
as 1:2016cv10058
Plaintiff:
George Johnson
Defendant:
Carol Higgins O'Brien, Jane Doe (Russo), Superintendent (MCI) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
