Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Barker v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv02816
Plaintiff:
Arthur Joyal Barker
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Kenneth Putnam and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barker v. Ochoc et al
as 4:2022cv02817
Plaintiff:
Arthur Joyal Barker
Defendant:
Amber Ochoc, Marcus Spivey, Melissa Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Unknown TDCJ Officers et al
as 3:2021cv00338
Plaintiff:
Arthur Joyal Barker
Defendant:
Unknown TDCJ Officers and Unknown UTMB Nurses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Kelley
as 6:2020cv00558
Plaintiff:
Arthur Joyal Barker
Defendant:
Dr Russell Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Barker v. J. Mitchell, et al
as 17-41080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR JOYAL BARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. NANCY MITCHELL and STEPHEN MARTIN
Barker v. Mitchell et al
as 9:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
Arthur Joyal Barker
Defendant:
J Nancy Mitchell and Stephen Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Barker v. Ruth Brouwer, et al
as 14-40947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR JOYAL BARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTH BROUWER, Medical Practitioner, JOYCE FRANCIS, Vocational Nurse and THOMAS MACIEL, Registered Nurse
Arthur Barker v. Ruth Brouwer, et al
as 13-40983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR JOYAL BARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTH BROUWER, Medical Practitioner, JOYCE FRANCIS, Vocational Nurse and THOMAS MACIEL, Registered Nurse
Barker v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Arthur Joyal Barker
Defendant:
Ruth Brouwer, Joyce Francis and Thomas Maciel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Potter County - 108 District Court et al
as 2:2008cv00188
Plaintiff:
Arthur Joyal Barker
Defendant:
Potter County - 108 District Court, Charles L Slaughter and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
