Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ROSARIO v. LOVERA et al
as 5:2024cv01924
Plaintiff:
JOVAN ROSARIO
Defendant:
JERAMY LOVERA, OFFICER BEST, SARGENT NAME UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. BEST et al
as 2:2023cv02114
Plaintiff:
WILFREDO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER NICOLE BEST, CORRECTIONS OFFICER WILLS, HEARING EXAMINER I. YODIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jeremiah v. Kovach et al
as 1:2020cv01915
Defendant:
Warden Bruce Kovach, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Richard Shoch and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Jeremiah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Knouse et al
as 3:2019cv01599
Defendant:
C. Knouse, Rob, R. Scott Cramer and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Huber et al
as 3:2019cv00789
Defendant:
Weakland, Adam Huber, John E. Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOCKETT v. WILKINSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv01213
Defendant:
RESOTRI, PATRICK KINAVEY, ALLEGHENY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL E. HOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MCFADDEN v. APPLE INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03779
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER BRIAN QUIRPLE, POLICE OFFICER JASON REID, POLICE OFFICER ANGEL ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
TALLI J. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00160
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, RENEE FOULDS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Garman et al
as 3:2016cv02487
Plaintiff:
Michael Nelson
Defendant:
Mark Garman, Marrisa Houser, Tim Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUNSON v. THE SEPTA PHILA TRANSIT SYSTEM et al
as 2:2014cv01357
Plaintiff:
PAUL MUNSON
Defendant:
THE SEPTA PHILA TRANSIT SYSTEM, JONIE TILLSON, JOYCE & APRIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
