Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Carawan v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2019ct03140
Plaintiff:
William C. Carawan, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. David White, Paula Smith, Phillip W. Tolman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carawan v. Perritt et al
as 5:2017ct03208
Plaintiff:
William C. Carawan, Jr.
Defendant:
Brad Perritt, Kayla Mercer and Case Manager Buffkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Michael Pickens v. Frank L. Perry
as 17-6993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK L. PERRY, ROBESON COUNTY, BRAD PERRITT and others
Pickens v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03189
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Pickens
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, Robeson County, Brad Perritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Dean Melvin v. Brad Perritt
as 16-6999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY DEAN MELVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD PERRITT, Superintendent, Lumberton Correctional, THEODORE BANKS, Programer/Rec Clerk Supervisor, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Pickens v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03155
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Pickens
Defendant:
Frank Perry, Robeson County, Brad Perritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03141
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Pickens
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, W.D. Guice, George T. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Painter v. Perritt et al
as 5:2016ct03134
Plaintiff:
Paul William Painter
Defendant:
Brad Perritt, Carmen Hendricks and Lyda Owen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin v. Perritt et al
as 5:2015ct03272
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Melvin
Defendant:
Brad Perritt, Theodore Banks, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omeako Brisbon v. Laticia Owen
as 15-7037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMEAKO L. BRISBON
Defendant - Appellee:
LATICIA OWENS, Head Nurse, MARY LOCKLEAR, Assistant Superintendent and BRAD PERRITT, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
