Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Louis v. Stirling
as 1:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Darryl Keith Louis, Jr. and Saddiq
Defendant:
Brian P. Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kinard v. Stirling et al
as 8:2022cv03889
Plaintiff:
Keaston D'Ahja Kinard
Defendant:
Brian P Stirling, C. Holbrook, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Simmons v. McMaster et al
as 8:2020cv02745
Plaintiff:
Johnathan D Simmons, Jonathan D Simmons and Jonathan Dale Simmons
Defendant:
Governor Henry McMaster, Brian P Stirling and Dennis Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. Stirling et al
as 2:2018cv00326
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Goss
Defendant:
Brian P Stirling, Warden Cothran, J Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv03265
Plaintiff:
Marion Katrell Campbell
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Brian P Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Baccus v. Brian Stirling
as 15-8030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN P. STIRLING, D. EASTRIDGE and OTHERS
Baccus v. Stirling et al
as 9:2015cv02670
Plaintiff:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Defendant:
Brian P Stirling, D Eastridge and Others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00248
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jenkins
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Brian P Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Stirling et al
as 6:2013cv03178
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ham
Defendant:
Brian P Stirling, John B Tomarchio, Michael McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Haley et al
as 6:2013cv03077
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ham
Defendant:
Nikki Haley, Brian P Stirling and John B Tomarchio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
