Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cleveland Dunn v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13679
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLEVELAND D. DUNN
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER INMATE HEALTH, GDC DIRECTOR HEALTH SERVICES and others
Hightower v. Putnam County et al
as 3:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Hightower, Jr.
Defendant:
Putnam County, Gator Deloach, Mattew Metz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PRATT et al
as 3:2020cv10269
Defendant:
SHEREEF M. ELNAHAL, C. WILLAIMS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Weller et al
as 4:2017cv03905
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Williams
Defendant:
Calvin Weller, Curtis D. Bridges, Jr., Charles H. Landis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCCIOLA v. ADMINISTRATOR, BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2014cv06709
Plaintiff:
BENIAMINO ANGELO LUCCIOLA
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR, BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROY HENDRICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Siegert et al
as 6:2013cv00216
Defendant:
Mr. D. Davis, Mr. FNU Grace and Cody Siegert
Plaintiff:
Devorio D. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
William Dunne v. D. Smith, et al
as 11-16342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. DUNNE
Defendant - Appellee:
D. SMITH, B. AVALOS, J. KARGE and others
Gupta v. Atkinson et al
as 1:2011cv20455
Plaintiff:
Mahendra P. Gupta
Defendant:
Ken Atkinson, A. Dobbs, R. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gupta v. Atkinson et al
as 0:2011cv60297
Plaintiff:
Mahendra P. Gupta
Defendant:
Ken Atkinson, A. Dobbs, R. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunne v. Zuercher
as 7:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
William D. Dunne
Defendant:
John C. Zuercher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
